The Mystery of ‘Paul Boyle’ and the Liverpool Car Attack

When a car ploughed through football fans on a Liverpool street in the UK during the Liverpool FC Victory Parade on May 28th 2025, with an alleged 79 people injured, the world was outraged. Initial reactions veered from fury and anger to confusion and despair.

Memories of the Hillsborough Disaster of 1989 surfaced, stirring up all kinds of emotion. (Hillsborough disaster - Wikipedia)

As the days went by, however, the public were sensing that something wasn’t quite right with regard to the reporting of this shocking event. When the national newspapers published photos of a man called Paul Desmond Sanders Doyle, naming him as the driver of the car and perpetrator of this heinous crime, people were baying for his blood. Within hours of these photos being published, however, eagle-eyed armchair detectives discovered that the photos weren’t recent with many saying they weren’t even photos of Paul Doyle.

First stop for many social media sleuths is a brief visit to IMDb website to see if the perpetrator was listed as an actor or crisis actor. The name of a dancer/actor called Paul Doyle popped up but, despite a passing resemblance to the guy in the newspaper and Facebook photographs, it became quickly apparent that he was a different guy.

Head, hand and ear shapes were fervently analysed and many came to the conclusion that the man in the photo in the car is not the man in any of the photos shared in the press; nor is he the same many featured in the courtroom sketches.

Other observations and theories are cropping up on a hourly basis - Doyle’s initials of PDSD being the same as the acronym for Proficiency in Designated Security Duties (to name but one) - but rather than jumping to conclusions, let’s work with the facts, not presumptions.

So what’s going on here?

Let’s start by checking the information we’ve been presented with so far:

• Video footage of a car driving through crowds on a busy street in Liverpool

• A couple of blurred stills of a driver

• Photos of ‘snipers’ (not in uniform ) on a nearby roof

• A few photos of the alleged culprit - a man named as Paul Doyle

• A Facebook account of a man called Jean-Paul Boyle showing the same photos shared by the press

• Courtroom sketches of Paul Doyle that look nothing like the photos shared in the press, the photos on Facebook or the photo of the man in the car

What we don’t have:

• Credible witness statements and TV interviews. (I’ve seen one interview so far - with a man called Dan Eveson who says his wife and child had been hit by the car - and it was far from convincing.)

• The amount of video footage from bystanders one would expect to have after an incident like this

• Confirmation from the press that the photos they’ve shared of Paul Doyle ARE actual photos of Paul Doyle

• Statements from Doyle’s friends and family

• Photos of the Paul Doyle who appeared in court this week

• Any footage of the driver being pulled out of the car

Questions that need to be asked based on the information we’ve been given so far:

• Where are all the images and video footage of the man driving the car? So far we’ve seen a couple of photos and a brief bit of video showing what appears to be a dummy  in the driver’s seat with its fake-looking hands seemingly glued to the steering wheel.

• Could this footage (of the driver) have been filmed prior to the incident?

• Where’s the footage and photos showing the driver being dragged from the car? (The MSM are presenting us with headlines and video ‘showing the moment’ this happens but there’s nothing to see)

• Who were the people with guns on the roof of a nearby building and why were they in civilian clothes?

• Why did the MSM share 16 year old photos of a man, naming him as Paul Doyle but use photos from the Facebook account of a man called Jean-Paul Boyle?

• Why has Jean-Paul Boyle and his family and friends not come forward?

• Why are there no recent photos of the alleged culprit?

• How did ‘Paul Doyle’ go from being balding in the 2009 photos to having a full head of curly hair 16 years later as seen in the courtroom sketches?

• Why does the man in the courtroom sketches look absolutely nothing like the man in any of the photos we’ve seen?

• Why does the driver of the car look nothing like any of the photos and sketches we’ve been allowed to see?

Those with an understanding of how the world works have slid deeper down the rabbit hole, asking whether the whole upsetting event was a false flag. Was it a psy-op, orchestrated to cause civil unrest in an area known as being a hotbed for social experimentation? (This is a whole new investigation in itself but worth considering.) Could it have been set up to distract from other news stories that are threatening to destabilise the already wobbly structure of UK politics - the story about Keir and the Ukrainian ‘models’ perhaps?

I’m sure there are more questions to be asked and no doubt further theories will develop as the story unfolds and the mainstream narrative unravels.

When looking into an incident like this, it’s never good to presume, but (contrary to mainstream opinion) I believe there’s no harm in speculating - even publicly - and absolutely nothing wrong with questioning a narrative, especially a mainstream one.

And for now, in my opinion, that’s what we should all be doing.